🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia states the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to accomplish desired population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, adding that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.